Product Reviews | Trail Reviews | Classifieds | Hotlinks | Forums | Races & Events | Gallery | Hot Deals
Home | Forums


MountainBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - Singlespeed


Archive Home >> Singlespeed(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 )


singleator question(5 posts)

singleator questionChequama Mama
Apr 16, 2002 8:25 PM
For those of you out there with singleators
What is the length between the pivot bolt and the hole for the arm that holds the pulley? I painted the two points red.

Would you rather the arm be shorter? longer? it's just right? is there any limitation to gearing?

I'm building my own singleator of a similar design. I'm actually going to start machining it on thursday. Before I actually make the thing I want to be sure that I'm about in the right ballpark for length. I'll definitely post pics when it's done.

Thanks

Paul
re: singleator questionbn
Apr 17, 2002 6:30 AM
I don't use one, but looks like you CAN go shorter.
Here ya go.Kitchenware
Apr 17, 2002 6:51 AM
Hope this helps. Shorter would be nice, that way when I cruise around town, my flip-flop heel wouldn't hit it. :)
thanksChequama Mama
Apr 17, 2002 4:12 PM
since mine has to push up I might make it longer, like a straight 4 inches so that it can still push up and not interfere if I want to run a really big cog. I'll live with hitting my heels on it if I have to. Thanks for the help guys.

Paul
here's a different thought.....qtip
Apr 17, 2002 7:17 AM
I have a singleator on my commuter/trials bike. The way I have it set up is with a 32:13 for commuting and a 22:22 for trials. It works great because with the loosening (and tightening) of a bolt I can move the gear for my desired application, and keep the same length of chain. Only problem I have is that with the 22 tooth on back (or bigger if you need), you need to run the singleator in a push down mode (pushing the chain down from the chainstay). I prefer the push up mode because I get better chain wrap on the cog, but with a big cog, the push up interferes with the cog, so a longer arm might be better for that application.
 


 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a division of E-centives, Inc.