Product Reviews | Trail Reviews | Classifieds | Hotlinks | Forums | Races & Events | Gallery | Hot Deals
Home | Forums


MountainBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - Brake Time


Archive Home >> Brake Time(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 )


Just bought Avid 203mm BBDB and now I'm not sure...(6 posts)

Just bought Avid 203mm BBDB and now I'm not sure...BrandonAggsMntnBk
Jan 3, 2004 12:08 PM
I just ordered a set of 203mm BBDB after reading up on them in the review section and seeing people say to go bigger on the calipers. After I ordered them I was talking with my LBS and the tech. guy said they would be overkill for my type of riding, which is race/leiseure cross country. Do you guys think I should keep with the 203mm or swap for a set of 185mm BBDB? Thanks for the help.

Brandon.
Still new?f*nætik (aka næstep)
Jan 3, 2004 12:49 PM
Otherwise I'd suggest you ride them and find out for yourself.

But my situation is that I'm primarily an XC clyde with a good share of steep descents. I run 185 front / 165 rear on my two bikes. I picked the 185 up front because I was overheating the smaller rotors on longer descents — other than the heat build up the 165's had enough power for me. But there's many a time I'm in slower, more technical situations where I hate the grabbiness of the 185 rotor and wish I still had the better modulating 165 installed. It's a compromise and something to get used to either way (including if you decide to stick with the 203's).
Still new?BrandonAggsMntnBk
Jan 3, 2004 2:39 PM
I bought them brand new and they're still in the box right now b/c my new wheelset hasn't come in yet and I want them to be new so I can trade them in for the 185mm if I go that route.

The reason Im considering the downgrade is b/c I don't ride a lot of long downhill at all. It is mainly minor downhill and then right back up the otherside.
Some will undoubtedly disagree...f*nætik (aka næstep)
Jan 3, 2004 2:53 PM
...but I think you'd be happier with 185 or 185/160.
w/o long downhillsdbAbuser
Jan 3, 2004 10:05 PM
they probly are overkill. I'm 190 (or so) and really like the 203's for riding near Denver. I also don't notice much in the way of reduced modulation b/t the 203 and the 165. But it's just extra weight to carry around on the worst place if you're not gonna be stressing the 160 or 185's that much.
There's also the fork warranty issue...Smytty
Jan 4, 2004 5:03 PM
Apparently, some manufacturers don't recommend using 8" rotors with a standard quick release - if you do, it voids the warranty. Personally, I would recommend 185 front, 160 rear. Once I get some more cash, that's what I'll be doing. Right now, I'm using 160's, and they're great for 90% of my riding. I'd like the 185 in front for the other 10%.
 


 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a division of E-centives, Inc.