Product Reviews | Trail Reviews | Classifieds | Hotlinks | Forums | Races & Events | Gallery | Hot Deals
Home | Forums


MountainBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - General Discussion


Archive Home >> General Discussion(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 )


Digital still Cameras?....(4 posts)

Digital still Cameras?....Hubba
Oct 4, 2002 9:57 AM
I know this must have been asked before (and if so anyone have the link?) but does anyone have any recommendations for small digi still cams I could take on rides?....I'm looking at the Minolta F100.

Just curious what others are using and if there's anything specific I should look for, so far my main concern was shutter priority for action shots, image size in case I want to print anything and compact enough to fit in my camelback, I even wondered about a remote (which this one has available) for solo ride pics! (I end up riding solo quite a bit)

Thanks

Hubba
Not to beat this subject to death...næstep
Oct 4, 2002 11:41 AM
...since it seems to have come up alot in the past few weeks, but...

I've had my F100 for just shy of a month now, and it's great combination of capability and portability.

If you haven't already, check out the forums on http://dpreview.com, and check that site, along with http://steves-digicams.com and http://imaging-resource.com for a collection of UP TO DATE, well composed camera reviews. There are a bunch of good cameras in this size and price range that will meet your critera. I, too, thought the F100 offered the best all-around package for what I needed, also giving consideration to the Oly D50, Pentax 430RS, Canon S40 and a few others.

I've been using it a bunch for eBay stuff (I'm very happy with the macro capability) and snapshots, but no "action shots" until I get my foot out of a splint.

Found the camera at FotoConnection.com and had it shipped for just shy of $400, but don't forget about batteries, memory (16mb is good for only 7 hi-res pics), and the remote and a case.

—næstep
Not to beat this subject to death...Hubba
Oct 5, 2002 6:33 AM
Thanks for the opinion. I've been checking the dpreview site but didn't know about the others.

Good luck with the foot....

Hubba
Thanks. And I just saw...næstep
Oct 5, 2002 9:53 AM
...yet another review posted on http://dcresource.com that was put up on Wednesday. At the end of that review, it points out some similar cameras you should take a look at.

The reviews, in and of themselves, aren't the best basis for judging a camera. When you stack the reviews up side by side, that gives a better picture of what you're comparing. The Olympus, for instance, also has remote capability, and has a remote sensor on the back of the camera in addition to on the front in case you're doing tripod photography (using the remote as a sub for a cable release). The Optio RS cameras have a low-light autofocus assist lamp to help with indoor shots.

And I'm sure you're familiar with the forums at DP Review already, where you can get a flavor of the misses of each camera (cause folks love to complain over there -- awfully difficult to browse those forums after you've made your decision/purchase). But, at least you'll know if low-light autofocus is really a problem of the camera you're considering, for instance.

Good luck with your decision.

—næstep
 


 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a division of E-centives, Inc.