Product Reviews | Trail Reviews | Classifieds | Hotlinks | Forums | Races & Events | Gallery | Hot Deals
Home | Forums


MountainBikeReview.com's Forum Archives - What Bike to Buy


Archive Home >> What Bike to Buy(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 )


'01 sugar 2 vs. '02 spec. stumpie fsr xc(7 posts)

'01 sugar 2 vs. '02 spec. stumpie fsr xcghostface killah
Apr 11, 2002 9:29 PM
hey guys, needing a little help.. ridden both bikes and have found advantages and disadvantages to both. Both bikes are priced exactly the same although the sugar 2 has better components and on the road I liked the sugar 2 better. LBS won't let me take them off-road though and was wondering if anyone had any personal comparisons or experience with either bike
re: '01 sugar 2 vs. '02 spec. stumpie fsr xcspecialized
Apr 12, 2002 2:28 AM
I like both bikes, but I would be a bit worried about the whold "chain suck/bending rings" bit that everyone grips about in the reviews. I would have thought you could have gotten the FSR XC for several hundred dollars less. I think of the two I'd take the FSR XC, but that's just my opinion.
by "chain suck/bending rings" I mean the Sugar (nm)specialized
Apr 12, 2002 7:22 AM
nm
re: '01 sugar 2 vs. '02 spec. stumpie fsr xcMikey
Apr 12, 2002 8:51 AM
Can't comment on the FSR as I've not ridden one. But I've had my '01 Sugar 2 for 16 months, about 1100 miles, and 3 races, and am very happy with it.

The build kit is mostly good - only shortcoming being the cranks which are corrected CHEAPLY. As soon as I got it, I took off the Bontrager Race cranks & LX BB and sold them as "new takeoffs" on eBay for MORE than what I paid for splined LX Hollowtech cranks & BB mailorder. The LX cranks have been trouble-free. Great shifting, only getting chainsuck at the "normal" times that you would on any bike, meaning when the drivetrain is excessively grimy. As long as it's reasonably clean & lubed it's fine. I also put on an XT cassette, ATAC pedals, and a rapidrise derailleur all at minimal cost by selling off the stock parts on eBay "as new".

The frame is nice (same as the $3K+ Sugar 1), and the '01 paint job is good with the metal-flake black. I did have to replace the pivot bushings ($35) at about 1000 miles. They were getting loose and upon inspection the anti-friction coating was mostly worn off. But this is normal maintenance.

I find the front & rear suspensions are well balanced. I'm 170 and have them each at 130 PSI. I am starting to think that my next bike will have more travel though. I love the ride, and can't feel the bike bottoming out, but from the indicators I have I am getting full travel both front & rear on most rides. Seems any air will use all the travel. I don't jump off stuff (I'm a roller in technical situations), just bunnyhopping at speed or airing rolls on fireroads.

The Bontrager Race wheels have been fine. Front is still true after more than a year. Back needed slight truing about a month ago. But again, they were straight for over a year.
What are you looking for in a bike?OldSchool
Apr 12, 2002 9:43 AM
I just picked up an FSR.

I have a nice hardtail that I'm planning on keeping (Team Marin). So, I was looking for a complimentary FS bike on the other side of the spectrum. In other words -- the Sugar, Fuel, NRS,..., all had "hardtial" traits. The FSR suspension is just tremendous. I'll be using it for 24hr races.

Here are the pros of the FSR:
* no suspension feedback when braking or spinning in all rings.
* no loss of suspension when hammering or braking.
* bearings at all pivots
* the bike geometry just fit me the best

Good luck,
Tim
What i am looking forghostface killah
Apr 12, 2002 10:21 AM
to sum it up I need a bike to keep up with my tri-athlete friend, but also a really good decender. I spend my summers doing climbs and technical downhills in BC and my winters in muddy, small uphill and downhill Ontario.
Why do you want a FS bike?OldSchool
Apr 12, 2002 12:28 PM
You could do all that on a hardtail.

How fast you descend or how well you clean a technical section is more dependant on your skills than your bike. I say this because I ride a lot of things on my HT that many with a FS rig walk. The bike does make a difference, but a friend of mine is fit and skilled. He rides an old $300 ridged bike -- and pretty much kicks ass up the hill and down.

So, why do you want a FS bike?

If your application is specific, I'd look at what the skilled riders in your area are on. Talk to them.

Good luck,
Tim
 


 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a division of E-centives, Inc.